©
Bobby Elliott, Version 1.1, May 2004
This
document may be freely distributed so long as the original source is
acknowledged and the contents are not altered.
This
document expresses the personal views of the author and is not representative of
the views of any other body. The author takes no responsibility for the contents
of linked websites which may change without notice; all links were appropriate
and operational at the time of writing.
Plagiarism is the use of
another person’s work (this could be their words, products or ideas) for
personal advantage without proper acknowledgement of the original work with the
intention of passing it off as your own. Plagiarism may occur deliberately (with
the intention to deceive) or accidentally (due to poor
referencing). Plagiarism can take many forms.
|
It includes copying material from a
book, copying-and-pasting information from the World Wide Web, getting
your parents to help with coursework – even copying answers from a fellow
student during an examination is a form of plagiarism (presuming the
copied work isn’t attributed!). Plagiarism and cheating are not the same
things; cheating takes many forms including – but not limited to –
deliberate plagiarism. Neither are plagiarism and collusion the same
things; although every occurrence of collusion is a form of
plagiarism. |
No. Plagiarism is neither a criminal nor
civil offence. In fact, plagiarism is not a legal term and is not legally
recognised. But breach of copyright or intellectual property rights (IPR) is
illegal; if an act of plagiarism breaches copyright or IPR then it is illegal.
Not every act of plagiarism is a breach of copyright. For example, you can
plagiarise work that has no copyright.
3.
Why is plagiarism a
problem?
Plagiarism is a problem because it
is a form of cheating. Irrespective of the student’s intention, undetected
plagiarism may result in the student receiving a higher grade than s/he would
have received without the inclusion of the plagiarised material. The resulting
(inflated) grade may be used for entrance to further education or employment –
thereby deceiving entrance officers or employers into believing that the student
possesses knowledge and skills that they do not. Plagiarism also holds back
progress. If students and researches simply regurgitate other people’s work
without adding anything of their own then academic progress stagnates through a
dearth of original work.
A less tangible problem is the corrosive
effects that plagiarism has on the student body and on society in general. Once
plagiarism reaches a certain level, students who would not normally plagiarise
may feel that they must in order to compete with their fellow students.
Undetected plagiarism may encourage cheating outside of school or college, and
foster bad habits which students take into the workplace.
Not everyone agrees
that plagiarism is a problem. Some people have claimed that small-scale
plagiarism is a form
of self-teaching.
There is no definitive, UK-wide research
into the frequency of plagiarism. Any research which has taken place has
focussed on the Higher Education (university) sector. There are no published
statistics for the school or college sectors; Awarding Bodies do not maintain
statistics specifically on plagiarism.
Of all the different forms of cheating
(which includes plagiarism, inventing data and cheating during an exam),
students admit to plagiarism more often than any other. Research
findings range from 25% to 90% of students admitting to some form of
plagiarism. However, this figure reduces considerably when students are asked
about the frequency of “serious” plagiarism (such as copying most of an
assignment or purchasing a complete paper from a website – more typically 20%
and 10% respectively).
Although research findings vary, a recurring
theme is that students estimate the occurrence of plagiarism (in all its forms)
higher than teaching staff, who estimate its frequency higher than Academic
Standards Committees. No reliable statistics exist for the school and college
sectors; Awarding Bodies report very low occurrences of
plagiarism.
5.
Is plagiarism getting
worse?
There is little primary research on
plagiarism to determine if it is getting worse. But there is empirical evidence
to suggest that plagiarism is becoming more common. Academic Standards
Committees (within universities) are reporting higher incidences of plagiarism.
Some leading
academics have claimed it’s getting worse. There have been several high
profile cases in schools
and universities. And
it’s a global
problem.
There are societal and technological reasons
for increased plagiarism. Students are under more
pressure to succeed than they were in the past. There is greater competition
among students for high grades. The digitisation of information has made it
easier to capture and adapt, and there are many more sources of information
today than in the past. The Internet, in particular, provides massive amounts of
information on every conceivable topic; there are dedicated
web sites which provide ready-made essays. It has also been argued that
student’s have a lax attitude towards intellectual property rights and cite the
large scale downloading
of popular music as an example of this attitude.
A paper mill is an
online essay bank. Some websites provide complete papers while others encourage
students to swap essays. There is a
growing market for made-to-order papers
which guarantee a specific level of degree. Some sites will create entire
papers and others provide an editing
service for existing material. Some sites claim to provide research assistance while others openly
admit to being cheating
sites.
There are subject-specific paper
mills which specialise in particular
subjects or, even, particular
topics.
7.
Why do students
plagiarise?
Some of the reasons for plagiarising are
covered above
but students may have more personal reasons such as:
·
being
unaware that they’re plagiarising
·
lacking
knowledge and understanding of the subject
·
poor
time management skills
·
feeling
that the subject is unimportant
·
believing that plagiarism isn’t
serious
·
feeling
pressurised due to over-assessment
·
poor teaching.
The most common reason given by students is
ignorance about plagiarism – that they were unclear about the plagiarism policy
and, therefore, unaware that they were doing anything wrong. A common
misunderstanding among students relates to paraphrased material. Many students
do not realise that paraphrased material should be attributed to the original
author in the same manner as a direct quotation.
Some students do not consider plagiarism a
serious offence since it does not (in their view) harm other students. Research
has shown that students consider cheating in an examination to be much more
serious than plagiarising coursework – even if both contribute to final grades.
Some students will rationalise plagiarism. Poor teaching, over-crowded
classrooms, too much assessment, “irrelevant” subject content, poor health, and
stress are commonly given as reasons.
8.
Is plagiarism ever
permissible?
No. By definition, plagiarism is cheating.
Some people confuse plagiarism with skilfully locating and combining information
from diverse sources. So long as the sources are acknowledged, combining
information in this way (even if the author contributes little or nothing) is
not plagiarism. But failing to acknowledge sources is, at best, poor
academic practice and, at worst, deceitful. However, teaching staff should
make a clear distinction between casual, low-value plagiarism and deliberate
plagiarism in a high-stakes assessment.
9.
What is accidental
plagiarism?
Accidental plagiarism occurs when students
do not intend to deceive but, nonetheless, plagiarise material by failing to
properly reference their sources. It can occur when a student is unaware of (or
unclear about) a centre’s plagiarism
policy. It may occur when a student is unsure how to reference
material. Accidental plagiarism can also occur when a student includes an
“original” idea which, in fact, is not original and was an idea that they
originally discovered from another source – and subsequently
forgot.
1.
What is the difference between
plagiarism and bad practice?
Bad practice occurs when a student cites
another person’s work but fails to properly attribute that work. Bad practice
also occurs when a student paraphrases another person’s work without due
attribution. Unlike “proper” plagiarism, there is no attempt to deceive and
there is usually some attempt at attributing the work (for example, including
quotation marks around the borrowed text or some vague reference: “It has been
claimed…”).
No.
3.
What can I do to reduce
plagiarism?
The best way to reduce plagiarism is to
tackle the causes of plagiarism.
The most common reason is lack of awareness
of plagiarism. So raising students’ awareness is a starting point. This can be
done by including plagiarism in their induction programme and re-inforcing this
throughout the term by the use of posters and regular reminders from teaching
staff. Centres should have a plagiarism
policy. Some centres provide each student with a copy of the policy. Some
universities require students to sign the policy and also require students to
sign a “no plagiarism” declaration when they submit courseworks.
Awareness-raising may also be required for teaching staff and (all) academic
staff should be consistent in their treatment of
plagiarism.
Students should be trained in research
methods and shown how
to cite. Students should also be taught time management techniques. This
training can be provided as part of a student’s induction
programme.
Students can be tempted to cheat if there’s
too much assessment in a course. So keep assessment to a minimum and try to
ensure that students see each assessment as worthwhile. Even “honest” students
can rationalise plagiarism if the teacher appears disinterested or the standard
of teaching is low, so maintaining teaching standards is
important.
Some students will cheat irrespective of
policies, teaching or curriculum and in these cases the only “solution” is
deterrence – which means the threat of detection and
punishment.
4.
How can I design assessments
to reduce plagiarism?
A simple (but crude) way of combating
plagiarism is to reduce the amount of coursework. Many teachers have concerns
about the potential for cheating within courseworks. Examination boards have
also experienced
problems, reporting that candidates sometimes achieve much higher marks in
courseworks than they do in examinations.
Courseworks can be devised to reduce their
potential for plagiarism. The more specific the assignment, the less likely it
is that candidates will be able to piece together “old” material. Each
coursework should be unique and as different as possible from previous
courseworks. The marking scheme can be devised to accredit time management,
requiring students to submit partially complete work at various milestones in
the development of their work. Once submitted, teachers can conduct oral
interviews to ensure that the student understands what they have written (this
can also be built-in to the marking scheme).
5.
What is a plagiarism
policy?
A plagiarism policy defines a centre’s rules
about plagiarism. It normally includes:
·
definition of
plagiarism
·
types
of plagiarism
·
examples of plagiarism
·
guidance on citing and
referencing
·
procedure for dealing with
plagiarism
·
penalties.
Most universities and some colleges have
procedures for plagiarism. Some call them guides and some call them
policies.
Some schools
have policies too – but very
few in the
6.
Is there a standard way of
referencing?
Yes. In fact, there are two common systems
in use in the
You normally reference a piece of work in
two places: (1) in the body of the text, and (2) in a bibliography at the end of
the text. You use brief references in the body of the text and
full references in the bibliography.
There are different ways of referencing
different types of publication. There are two types of publication: (1) printed,
(2) online. Printed publications include textbooks and journals, and online
publications include web pages and newsgroups. Each type of publication has its
own style of referencing. The Open University uses a modified version of
the Harvard system which might be appropriate for schools and
colleges.
There is no requirement (nor need) to
reference hyperlinks within online publication (such as this FAQ) since these
links forward the reader directly to the source material.
Common knowledge is something that is widely
know and accepted by most people. For example, historical dates, mathematical
formulae, and (some) scientific principles and theories fall into the category
of common knowledge. There is no need to attribute or reference common
knowledge.
8.
How can I detect
plagiarism?
Prevention is better than cure so taking
steps to reduce plagiarism is better than elaborate detection systems. But
detection is better than permitting plagiarism. There are two ways to detect
plagiarism: (1) traditional methods, and (2) electronic
methods.
Traditional methods include the established
methods of spotting cheating. These include: (1) visual inspection of the
material to identify unusual language, inconsistent presentation, irrelevant
text, “left-overs” from the copied text etc.; (2)
comparison with student’s previous work to identify inconsistent standards – a
sudden leap in quality may indicate malpractice.
There are three types of electronic
detection: (1) search engines, (2) anti-plagiarism software, and (3) online
services. You can use a standard search engine to check students’ work. This is
done by submitting parts
of the work (such as suspect sentences or phrases) to the search engine and
looking for matches. You can also purchase specialised
software to detect plagiarism. This software will analyse a piece of writing
and compare it with a database of source material. Lastly, you can subscribe to
an online service which will require you to upload students’ work and the
service will compare the material with an online database of similar writing. Some of these services will compare the
material with printed sources (such as academic journals) and will integrate
with VLEs (such as WebCT and Blackboard). The best known online service in the
It is difficult to prove plagiarism. Neither
traditional nor electronic means of detecting plagiarism are foolproof.
If you suspect plagiarism, the first thing
you should do is to interview the student. Unless you have irrefutable proof,
this is not the time make accusations. The outcome of this interview will be one
of two things: (1) your concerns are addressed, or (2) your concerns are
confirmed. Irrespective of the outcome of this initial interview, the fact that
it has taken place should be recorded (together with the
outcome).
If you wish to take the matter further, the
procedure will vary from centre to centre. In a school environment you may want
to discuss it with the Principal Teacher who may decide to refer it to an
Assistant Head Teacher who has responsibility for quality. In a college
environment you may want to refer it to your Head of Department who may decide
to pass it to the Academic Standards Committee. The centre’s plagiarism
policy would define the precise procedure for each
centre.
10. What penalties are applied to
plagiarism?
There are no standard penalties for
plagiarism. However, the penalties within a specific centre should be clearly
defined in the centre’s plagiarism
policy. The following factors are normally considered when establishing a
penalty:
·
whether
the offence was accidental or deliberate
·
scale
of the offence
·
value
of the assessment
·
level
of the qualification being sought
·
honesty
of the student
·
remorse
of the student
·
previous history of the
student.
The penalties include:
·
reduction in marks
·
resubmission of work
·
zero
marks
·
suspension
·
expulsion
·
legal
action.
So, at one extreme you have first time,
accidental plagiarism on a small-scale in a low value assessment within a low
level qualification. At the other extreme, you have repeated, deliberate,
large-scale plagiarism in a high-value assessment within an advanced
qualification – and the student denies all responsibility and shows no remorse.
The penalties would reflect these different scenarios.
11. What can awarding bodies do
about plagiarism?
Within the school and college sectors, the
curriculum is defined by an Awarding Body (such as SQA). There are a number of steps that
Awarding Bodies can take to combat plagiarism.
Some Awarding Bodies have reduced the amount
of coursework within their awards; it is easier to plagiarise a coursework than
an examination. Providing a bank of courseworks (rather than one or two) reduces
plagiarism by permitting centres to regularly change assessments. Creating
highly specific assessments (rather than very general ones) combats plagiarism
by reducing the amount of material available for the student to copy. Awarding
Bodies normally carry out a quality assurance function within their centres
(normally though visiting verifiers) and can therefore exert some influence over
centres (such as encouraging them to create – and apply – plagiarism policies).
And, of course, Awarding Bodies can provide advice and support to centres on
matters relating to plagiarism.
12. Are there links between
plagiarism in school and college, and plagiarism in
university?
University teachers claim that some pupils
learn bad habits in school which they carry into university. Few school pupils are trained in
research methods and referencing. There is no standard approach towards
plagiarism within
13. What are the plagiarism
myths?
·
·
Having a plagiarism policy means we have a
plagiarism problem. It
doesn’t. It means that your centre recognises the issue and takes it seriously.
The existence of a plagiarism policy is an indication of high academic
standards.
·
·
Only poor students
plagiarise. It’s sometimes
argued that plagiarism is only attempted by less-able students. But plagiarism
is equally likely across all ability ranges. In fact, some people have argued
that it more likely to occur at higher levels due to the increased competition
and pressure to succeed at this level.
·
·
Tackling plagiarism will harm recruitment.
It’s been claimed that having a
reputation for “being tough on cheating” will deter students from coming to a
college. In fact, it should have the opposite effect. High academic standards
should improve a centre’s reputation and aid recruitment.
·
My centre has a plagiarism policy so we’re
OK. It’s not sufficient to
have a plagiarism policy if pupils/students are not aware of the policy. In
fact, it’s not sufficient to have a known policy if the policy is not followed
by teachers – as a recent case
demonstrated.
14. Where can I find out
more?
There are various plagiarism-related
resources. There are plagiarism websites, plagiarism mailing lists and
even a plagiarism blog.